![]() Wasn't this a fancy image viewer a few years ago? Apparently it's now a RAW developer.Īllegedly super fast, with great sharpening and noise removal.Īnother new developer, borne out of a dedicated noise reduction tool, and with an emphasis on “intelligent” tools. ACDSee Photo Studio Ultimate 2020 13.0 ( $9/month or $150).This one works straight on files in the file system, though, which is highly attractive to me. Not exactly what I'm looking for, but we'll see about its “normal” RAW development chops.Īnother highly regarded developer with rather traditional tools. Allegedly extremely high image quality, but no local adjustments whatsoever.Ī rather new developer, with fancy AI features such as automatic sky replacements. Allegedly the best default color rendition, particularly for Fuji cameras.įree, works on Linux. Capture One 20.0.4 ( $29/month or $350)Įnormously expensive, even with the educational discount.Currently only available at a subscription price, but there is a “free” version available through my university. Adobe Lightroom Classic CC 7.5 ( $10/month).Allegedly, not particularly fast, with a confusing user interface. That said, I will leave all other adjustments on their default settings, to still get an impression of the general look of the programs.įree, works on Linux, very familiar to me. By limiting myself to these edits, I hope to get an unbiased idea of the various RAW developer's implementations, without needing to ask the endless “what if” of what else I could have done. But for this test, I'm explicitly not doing anything particularly artistic merely some highlight recovery, shadow recovery, and local white balance adjustments. Obviously, I am a lot more proficient in my current tool, Darktable, than in any of the others. I would prefer a file-based workflow with edits stored alongside the RAW files 2, and I would prefer a perpetual license instead of a rental contract, but I'm willing to compromize on both if it's worth it 3. I have yet to see a photograph that was ruined by them, and most RAW developers seem to do a sufficient job at them. In contrast to most other comparisons on the 'net 1, I won't concern myself too much with sharpness and noise reduction and demosaicing. Must support my past and present cameras (Fuji X-E3, Ricoh GR, Pentax Q7, Nikon D7000).Must run acceptably with files on a network share.Must run acceptably on my Surface tablet.And they all have rabid fan bases, and apparently unique rendering. There are so many RAW developers out there. The manual is terrific and it's easy to go back to for a brief explanation for a particular control.Choice. The post isn't as long or as detailed as the RawTheapee manual, "RawPedia," but it explains why that manual is required when you might not have needed a manual to understand some simpler to use application. My most recent explanation was when version 5.7 of RT came out: ![]() The rationale for so many different controls is easy to explain and so is the solution for how to go beyond it to use the great power of RT. That conclusion is based on misunderstanding the reason for all the controls and an assumption that one must use them all and really mess up the photo in the process. The complaint is that there are so many different controls that deal with similar photographic issues making the program confusing and too complex to be useful. OK, a continuing complaint about RawTherapee over the years is one that I've posted about several times. RawTherapee 5.8 can be downloaded for Windows, Mac and Linux from the software's website. Those two features aside, the new update brings various improvements to camera models, optimizes tools, speeds up the application, improves its memory management and fixes a number of unspecified bugs. Though it's not explicitly stated, it appears the team plans to add metadata support for these files in the future. The team says that at this point in time, RawTherapee can decode the image data so that users can process these image files it cannot, however, retrieve the metadata. In addition, RawTherapee 5.8 adds support for Canon's CR3 raw image format. The RawTherapee team explains that Capture Sharpening can be used with Post-Resize Sharpening in order to produce 'detailed and crisp results.' The tool is found within the 'Raw' tab. RawTherapee 5.8 brings a new tool called Capture Sharpening that automatically recovers the detail lost due to diffraction/lens blur. This is a relatively small update, at least as far as general users are concerned. Free, open-source software RawTherapee has been updated to version 5.8, the team behind the product has announced.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |